附加元件
對 Český slovník pro kontrolu pravopisu 的評論
32 篇附加元件的評論
評分: 5 / 5 顆星
A short version of what DelphyM was writing:
Czech diacritics were haphazard for a long time so we got used to writing Czech without diacritics. After a while, we learnt to read it without problems and, if we are lazy, it's of course easier to write. I am now switching back to diacritics because I like the language and because some people did not go through the same experience and find it much easier to read.
I have just received the dictionary and, so far, I am happy with it.
評分: 5 / 5 顆星
Nefunkční kontrola pravopisu TB 3.0.3 ???
Kontrola pravopisu TB 3.0.x je funkční, ale...
Je třeba správně zvolit jazyk:
«Cestina» kontroluje češtinu bez diakritiky (důležité a skvělé!),
«Tchèque» češtinu ku př. ve francouzské verzi Thunderbirdu 3.0.5 (OS Windows XP).
Díky a pozdravy «Mozillákům»
評分: 5 / 5 顆星
Slovník češtiny bez diakritiky je skvělej, díky za něj ...
Ještě by se hodil slovník nespisovné češtiny bez diakritiky ... :)
評分: 5 / 5 顆星
BTW: working fine new update 1.0.1 with TB 3.0.4 on linux 64bit
2 cristian, there are many reasons why you would like to have this.
1) From history reasons, the CZ language nor keyboard wasn't always presented on the system. So such users didn't have any possibility writing with diacritic. And still there are users who cannot switch their kb (and don't ask me why they using something else then CZ kb)
2) convenient, like me, I hate switching CZ/US keyboard or learn ugly trick/shortcuts how to write US (standard kb char, like $#%^&, etc.) on CZ kb or vice versa.
3) compatibility issue. Still in these days happening that some of email srvs can treat emails only only in 7bit, so our diacritic from 8th bit get lost, and thus then is very hard read such damage language, better damage it in the way not using diacritic
4) personally (from the above mentioned reason, which is surprisingly still valid, but not so often) I accepting the act someone writing me in full CZ (w diacritic) as a act of discourtesy without asking me first the permission on which encoding we will use and whether our HWS/SW are able display such chars like CZ diacritic.
understand?
評分: 1 / 5 顆星
Potvrzuji, slovníky nefunkční s vezí Thunderbird 3.0.3, OS Windows Vista SP2.
Instalováno přes spravce doplňků. Hodí to hlášku o nekompatibilitě. Již jsem psal na Mozilla.cz, tak uvidíme.
評分: 1 / 5 顆星
Nekompatibilní s aktuální verzí Thunderbirdu 3.0.1.
此意見為舊版本 (1.0.1) 的附加元件。評分: 3 / 5 顆星
Nejde mi nainstalovat, prý nepodporuje FF 3.6
此意見為舊版本 (1.0.1) 的附加元件。評分: 4 / 5 顆星
vyhovuje mi, odpovídá potřebě.
此意見為舊版本 (1.0.1) 的附加元件。評分: 4 / 5 顆星
One star down for the version without diacritcs.
If it would replace the words without diacritics with the properly spelled it would be flawless.
評分: 5 / 5 顆星
Two versions are very useful. It is really clever that there is also a version without the diacritical marks. True, this is "wrong" Czech, but if you work from, say USA set computer, and write in ASCII to be sure about delivery to another computer, this is great help. Although I consider myself a good speller, I found a few mistakes I was consistently making. As seems to be the case with other Czech spellers using the diacritical marks, the hints for misspelled word often miss two similar words, differing by a diacritical mark. Also, a hint to replace "y" for "z" (flipped on the Czech keyboard) would be a nice feature.
此意見為舊版本 (1.0.1) 的附加元件。評分: 4 / 5 顆星
I'm not a Czech, so consider my opinion an outside view. I find it really lame to have two dictionaries, one with diacritics and one without. There is only one way of correctly writing Czech. Why would anybody who writes without diacritics (i.e. incorrectly) bother using a spell checker in the first place?
此意見為舊版本 (1.0.1) 的附加元件。評分: 5 / 5 顆星
EN: v1.0.1 work with FF v3.0.1 :)
CS: v1.0.1 už funguje se FF v3.0.1 :)
請選擇一個原因：
如果您要新增自己的收藏集，你必須先申請一個 Mozilla 附加元件的帳號。
